(PC) McMillion v. Doer

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SKYLER MCMILLION, No. 1:24-cv-01557-KES-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING 13 v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 J. DOER, et al.,

15 Defendants. 16 Docs. 16, 18 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights complaint pursuant 19 to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This matter was 20 referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 21 302. 22 On March 5, 2025, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 23 recommending that plaintiff’s motion for class certification be denied. Doc. 18. The findings and 24 recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were 25 to be filed within fourteen (14) days after service. Id. at 2. Plaintiff did not file objections and 26 the time to do so has passed. 27 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de 28 novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and 1 || recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. 2 Accordingly: 3 1. The findings and recommendations issued on March 5, 2025, Doc. 18, are ADOPTED IN 4 FULL; and 5 2. Plaintiff's motion for class certification filed on March 3, 2025, Doc. 16, is DENIED. 6 7 g | IT ISSO ORDERED. _ 9 Dated: _ May 21, 2025 4h | | 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28