(PC) McDonald v. Jones
Opinion
JEFFREY D. McDONALD, No. 2:24-cv-01027-TLN-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER GENA JONES, et al, Defendants. Plaintiff Jeffrey D. McDonald (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 6, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff did not file objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 11) are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 2. Plaintiffs motion for temporary restraining order (ECF No. 10) is DENIED. Date: October 2, 2024
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PC) McDonald v. Jones ((PC) McDonald v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.