(PC) McCraven v. Shannon

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JESSICA MARIE MCCRAVEN, No. 2:23-cv-00935 DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 DR. SHANNON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed December 8, 2023, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and sixty days leave 18 to file an amended complaint was granted. One hundred and twenty-six days from that date have 19 now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the 20 court’s order. 21 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is 22 directed to assign a district judge to this case; and 23 IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 24 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 1 | “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 2 | failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 3 | Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (th Cir. 1991). 4 | Dated: April 12, 2024 5 6 4 ORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 | pits DB/Prisoner Inbox/Civil Rights/r/mecr.935 .fta 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28