(PC) Matthews v. Pinchback

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedFebruary 5, 2025
Docket2:22-cv-01329
StatusUnknown

This text of (PC) Matthews v. Pinchback ((PC) Matthews v. Pinchback) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
(PC) Matthews v. Pinchback, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 || DEREK MATTHEWS Case No.: 2:22-cv-01329 DJC CSK P 10 Plaintiff, ) ORDER AND STIPULATED ) PROTECTIVE ORDER 11 vs. 12 || A. TOUT, B. SYSOMBATH, and DOE ) DEFENDANTS 1-10 ) 13 ) 14 Defendants. □ 15 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 91), an 16 || finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See L.R. 141.1. 17 || Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court APPROVES the protective order (EC 18 91), subject to the following clarification. 19 The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain 20 jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R. 2] 141.1(f); see Bylin Heating Sys., Inc. v. Thermal Techs., Inc., 2012 WL 13237584, at *2 (E.D. 22 II Cal. Oct. 29, 2012) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain jurisdiction for 23 disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the case). Thus, the Court will not retain 24 jurisdiction over this protective order once the case is closed.

25 |) Dated: February 4, 2025 ( 4 LAK \ . Li —_— 26 /l/matt1329.po.r CHI SOO EIM 27 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 In light of this order, the Court has removed “proposed” from the order’s title throughout the document. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER MATTHEWS V. TOUT, ET AL., CASE NO. 2:22-CV-01329 DJC CSK P PAGE 1

1 Jenny C. Huang, SBN 223596 Audra C. Call (SBN 252804) JUSTICE FIRST Deputy Attorney General 2 490 43rd Street, # 108 300 South Spring Street, Suite 1702 Oakland, CA 94609 Los Angeles, CA 90013-1230 3 Tel.: (510) 847-0485 Tel: (213) 269-6611 4 Fax: (510) 605-3903 Fax: (916) 761-3641 E-mail: jhuang@justicefirst.net E-mail: Audra.Call@doj.ca.gov 5 Attorney for Plaintiff Derek Matthews Attorney for Defendants A. Tout, 6 and B. Sysombath 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 ) ) 12 DEREK MATTHEWS ) Case No.: 2:22-cv-01329 DJC CSK P ) 13 Plaintiff, ) ORDER AND STIPULATED ) 14 vs. ) PROTECTIVE ORDER ) 15 A D. E T FO ENU DT, A B N. TS SY 1S -O 1M 0 BATH, and DOE ) ) 16 ) ) 17 Defendants. ) ) 18 19 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 20 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 21 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 22 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 23 The types of information that the parties seek to protect under this protective order include, but 24 are not limited to, (1) investigation files, (2) confidential prisoner records, (3) medical records, 25 and (4) the personal identifying information of the Defendants. A protective order is necessary 26 for the following particularized reasons: (1) to protect confidential information, (2) to protect 27 Plaintiff’s privacy with regard to portions of his prison records that are not relevant to the 28 incident at issue, (3) to protect Plaintiff’s patient privacy and protected health information, and STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 (4) to protect the safety and security interests of the California Department of Corrections and 2 Rehabilitation. The parties agree that this listing is prospective only and that it should not be 3 taken as a representation by either party that responsive documents exist in any specified 4 category or will be produced. 5 The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all 6 disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and 7 use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 8 under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge that this Stipulated 9 Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal and that the 10 local rules set forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied 11 when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 12 2. DEFINITIONS 13 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 14 information or items under this Order. 15 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 16 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule 17 of Civil Procedure 26(c). 18 2.3 Counsel: Counsel of Record for the parties and the support staff for such counsel. 19 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that 20 it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 21 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”. 22 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the 23 medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 24 testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or 25 responses to discovery in this matter. 26 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 27 the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 28 consultant in this Action. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2.7 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or 2 Items: extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items,” disclosure of which to another 3 Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by 4 less restrictive means. 5 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 6 entity not named as a Party to this action. 7 2.9 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 8 consultants, retained experts, and Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 9 2.10 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 10 Material in this action. 11 2.11 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 12 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and 13 organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and 14 subcontractors. 15 2.12 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 16 “CONFIDENTIAL,” or as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 17 2.13 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 18 Producing Party. 19 3. SCOPE 20 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material 21 (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) 22 all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, 23 conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 24 However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following 25 information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a 26 Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as 27 a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the 28 public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who 2 obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating 3 Party. Protected material includes documents identified as “Confidential” or “Highly 4 Confidential” prior to the date of executing this protective order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
(PC) Matthews v. Pinchback, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pc-matthews-v-pinchback-caed-2025.