(PC) Matthews v. Pinchback

District Court, E.D. California·Decided February 5, 2025·No. 2:22-cv-01329·Unknown

Opinion

DEREK MATTHEWS Case No.: 2:22-cv-01329 DJC CSK P Plaintiff, ) ORDER AND STIPULATED ) PROTECTIVE ORDER vs. A. TOUT, B. SYSOMBATH, and DOE ) DEFENDANTS 1-10 ) ) Defendants. □ The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 91), an finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See L.R. 141.1. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court APPROVES the protective order (EC 91), subject to the following clarification. The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R. 2] 141.1(f); see Bylin Heating Sys., Inc. v. Thermal Techs., Inc., 2012 WL 13237584, at *2 (E.D. II Cal. Oct. 29, 2012) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain jurisdiction for disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the case). Thus, the Court will not retain jurisdiction over this protective order once the case is closed.

) Dated: February 4, 2025 ( 4 LAK \ . Li —_— /l/matt1329.po.r CHI SOO EIM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE In light of this order, the Court has removed “proposed” from the order’s title throughout the document. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER MATTHEWS V. TOUT, ET AL., CASE NO. 2:22-CV-01329 DJC CSK P PAGE 1

Jenny C. Huang, SBN 223596 Audra C. Call (SBN 252804) JUSTICE FIRST Deputy Attorney General 490 43rd Street, # 108 300 South Spring Street, Suite 1702 Oakland, CA 94609 Los Angeles, CA 90013-1230 Tel.: (510) 847-0485 Tel: (213) 269-6611 Fax: (510) 605-3903 Fax: (916) 761-3641 E-mail: jhuang@justicefirst.net E-mail: Audra.Call@doj.ca.gov Attorney for Plaintiff Derek Matthews Attorney for Defendants A. Tout, and B. Sysombath

) ) DEREK MATTHEWS ) Case No.: 2:22-cv-01329 DJC CSK P ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER AND STIPULATED ) vs. ) PROTECTIVE ORDER ) A D. E T FO ENU DT, A B N. TS SY 1S -O 1M 0 BATH, and DOE ) ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. The types of information that the parties seek to protect under this protective order include, but are not limited to, (1) investigation files, (2) confidential prisoner records, (3) medical records, and (4) the personal identifying information of the Defendants. A protective order is necessary for the following particularized reasons: (1) to protect confidential information, (2) to protect Plaintiff’s privacy with regard to portions of his prison records that are not relevant to the incident at issue, (3) to protect Plaintiff’s patient privacy and protected health information, and STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (4) to protect the safety and security interests of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. The parties agree that this listing is prospective only and that it should not be taken as a representation by either party that responsive documents exist in any specified category or will be produced. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal and that the local rules set forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). 2.3 Counsel: Counsel of Record for the parties and the support staff for such counsel. 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”. 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 2.7 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items: extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items,” disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive means. 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 2.9 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, retained experts, and Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 2.10 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this action. 2.11 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 2.12 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL,” or as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 2.13 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Protected material includes documents identified as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” prior to the date of executing this protective order. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 4. DURATION Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and def

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Matthews v. Pinchback, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

(PC) Matthews v. Pinchback ((PC) Matthews v. Pinchback) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.