(PC) Martirosyan v. Madsen

District Court, E.D. California·Decided August 28, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-01168·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 RAFAEL MARTIROSYAN, Case No. 1:24-cv-01168-JLT-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (SEVEN DAYS) 13 v. TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT

14 MADSEN, et al., (ECF No. 22)

15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Rafael Martirosyan (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 18 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On June 20, 2025, the Court issued an order construing Plaintiff’s filing as a motion to file 20 an amended complaint and motion to stay case and granted Plaintiff’s motion to file an amended 21 complaint and denied the motion to stay the case. (ECF Nos. 15, 17). Plaintiff was directed to 22 file a second amended complaint including all relevant claims and defendants to be raised in this 23 action, limited to 25 pages in length, excluding exhibits (or file a notice of voluntary dismissal). 24 (ECF No. 17.) 25 On July 25, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to file an 26 amended complaint. (ECF No. 20.) The Court directed Plaintiff to file a second amended 27 complaint including all relevant claims and defendants to be raised in this action, limited to 25 28 pages in length, excluding exhibits, or file a notice of voluntary dismissal within thirty days from 1 the date of service of the order. (Id. at 3.) The Court cautioned that if Plaintiff failed to file a 2 second amended complaint (or notice of voluntary dismissal) in compliance with the Court’s 3 order, then the action would be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to prosecute, failure to obey 4 a court order, and failure to state a claim. (Id.) Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (or notice 5 of voluntary dismissal) was due on or before August 27, 2025. 6 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s request for a seven-day extension of time to file a 7 second amended complaint, filed August 27, 2025. (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiff requests an extension 8 of time to finish drafting the second amended complaint and obtain necessary documents to attach 9 as exhibits. Plaintiff explains that since the prior order granting him an extension, he has been 10 busy and preoccupied with his obligations in other cases: 2:21-cv-6433-PA MAR consolidated 11 with 2:23-cv-3346-PA-MAR, and 2:22-cv-6259-PA-MAR. He also has taken up two college 12 courses. With regard to his other cases, Plaintiff indicates that he had to appear for virtual 13 conferences, and draft pre-settlement conference briefs and other documents, which took a 14 substantial of amount of his time. He did not have a laptop during that time, but he does now. 15 (Id.) 16 Having considered the request, Plaintiff has shown good cause for the brief extension of 17 time to file a second amended complaint (or a notice of voluntary dismissal). Fed. R. Civ. P. 18 6(b). 19 Plaintiff is reminded that his second amended complaint should be brief, Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 8(a), but it must state what each named defendant did that led to the deprivation of Plaintiff’s 21 constitutional rights, Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009). Although accepted as true, 22 the “[f]actual allegations must be [sufficient] to raise a right to relief above the speculative level . 23 . . .” Bell Atlantic v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (citations omitted). Any amended 24 complaint shall be limited to 25 pages in length, excluding exhibits. Plaintiff may not join 25 unrelated claims. 26 Additionally, Plaintiff may not change the nature of this suit by adding new, unrelated 27 claims in his amended complaint. George v. Smith, 507 F.3d 605, 607 (7th Cir. 2007) (no 28 “buckshot” complaints). 1 Finally, Plaintiff is advised that an amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. 2 Lacey v. Maricopa County., 693 F.3d 896, 927 (9th Cir. 2012). Therefore, Plaintiff’s amended 3 complaint must be “complete in itself without reference to the prior or superseded pleading.” 4 Local Rule 220. 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 6 1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to file a second amended complaint, (ECF No. 7 22), is GRANTED; 8 2. Within seven (7) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file a second 9 amended complaint including all relevant claims and defendants to be raised in this 10 action (or file a notice of voluntary dismissal); 11 3. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint shall be limited to 25 pages in length, excluding 12 exhibits; and 13 4. If Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint (or a notice of voluntary 14 dismissal) in compliance with this order, this action will be dismissed, with prejudice, 15 for failure to prosecute, failure to obey a court order, and failure to state a claim. 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17

18 Dated: August 28, 2025 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 19

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Martirosyan v. Madsen, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

(PC) Martirosyan v. Madsen ((PC) Martirosyan v. Madsen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
550 U.S. 544 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (Supreme Court, 2009)
Michael Lacey v. Joseph Arpaio
693 F.3d 896 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
George v. Smith
507 F.3d 605 (Seventh Circuit, 2007)