(PC) Magana v. Redman

Opinion

ANGEL JESUS MAGANA, No. 2:23-cv-0016 WBS CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER GARY REDMAN, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 13, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. The vague and conclusory allegations of plaintiff’s complaint fail demonstrate how the conditions complained of have resulted in a deprivation of plaintiffs constitutional rights. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 13, 2023 are adopted in full; and 2. This action is dismissed. Dated: April 12, 2023 dh ble t_ R4..b-€— UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE maga0016jo