(PC) Khouanmany v. Alencastre

Opinion

VILAYCHITH KHOUANMANY, No. 2:17-cv-01326-TLN-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER UNITED STATES MARSHALS, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with an action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 6, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. /// Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed May 6, 2020, are ADOPTED IN FULL; and 2. All claims in the third amended complaint, other than Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment sexual assault claims against Defendants Deppe and Alencastre, are DISMISSED without leave to amend. DATED: June 19, 2020