(PC) Khademi v. INS Immigration and Naturalization
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVOOD KHADEMI, No. 2:23-cv-00281 TLN AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 INS IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION, 15 Defendant. 16
17 18 On December 6, 2023, the court denied plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis 19 and ordered that plaintiff pay the filing fee in full for this action in order to proceed. ECF No. 8. 20 By order dated December 13, 2023, plaintiff was given 21 days to pay the filing fee and was 21 warned that failing to do so would result in dismissal. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff has not paid the filing 22 fee. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 24 prejudice. 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 1 | and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 2 | time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 3 | (th Cir. 1991). 4 | DATED: August 22, 2024 ~ 5 Httven— Lhar—e_ ALLISON CLAIRE 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PC) Khademi v. INS Immigration and Naturalization ((PC) Khademi v. INS Immigration and Naturalization) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.