(PC) Kelly v. Jones

District Court, E.D. California·Decided November 25, 2024·No. 1:24-cv-01063·Unknown

Opinion

JAMES CARL KELLY, Case No.: 1:24-cv-01063 JLT SKO Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO GAVIN NEWSOME, et al., (Doc. 8) Defendants. The Court found Plaintiff is subject to the three strikes bar of 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 8.) However, Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee, despite a warning that failure to do so would result in dismissal. (Ud. at 2.) Without such payment, the action cannot proceed. See Saddozai v. Davis, 35 F.4th 705 (9th Cir. 2022) (when subject to the three strikes bar, “the prisoner must pay the whole filing fee up front before bringing another lawsuit”). Thus, the Court ORDERS: 1. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.

Dated: November 23, 2024 Charis [Tourn TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Kelly v. Jones, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

(PC) Kelly v. Jones ((PC) Kelly v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shikeb Saddozai v. Ron Davis
35 F.4th 705 (Ninth Circuit, 2022)