(PC) Keesee v. Stanislaus County

Opinion

ZACHERY SCOTT KEESEE, No. 2:23-cv-1854 DAD CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS STANISLAUS COUNTY, et al., Defendants. On May 16, 2025, plaintiff’s second amended complaint was dismissed with leave to a third amended complaint. The time granted for filing a third amended complaint has expired and plaintiff has not filed a third amended complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified ///// ////// time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). || Dated: 08/11/25 Card Kt | / 4 L , ag. — UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE fi kees1854-fta 1]