(PC) Kasey F. Hoffman v. Pulido

District Court, E.D. California·Decided January 23, 2020·No. 1:18-cv-00209·Unknown

Opinion

1 2

6 7 10 11 KASEY F. HOFFMANN, Case No.: 1:18-cv-00209-AWI-SKO

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK 13 v. OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE

14 L. PULIDO; C. SMITH, 15 Defendants. 16 17 On January 21, 2020, Plaintiff Kasey F. Hoffmann filed a notice of voluntary dismissal 18 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). (Doc. 29.) Rule 41(a) provides that a “plaintiff 19 may dismiss an action without a court order by filing … a notice of dismissal before the opposing 20 party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). 21 Once a dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is properly filed, no order of the court is necessary to 22 effectuate dismissal; the dismissal is effective automatically. Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. 23 Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir. 1999). 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Because Plaintiff filed a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1), and no opposing party 2 has appeared in this case, this action has terminated. Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk 3 of the Court to close this case. 4

6 Sheila K. Oberto Dated: January 23, 2020 /s/ . 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Kasey F. Hoffman v. Pulido, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

(PC) Kasey F. Hoffman v. Pulido ((PC) Kasey F. Hoffman v. Pulido) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.