(PC) Joyce v. Patel

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedFebruary 5, 2025
Docket1:24-cv-00422
StatusUnknown

This text of (PC) Joyce v. Patel ((PC) Joyce v. Patel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
(PC) Joyce v. Patel, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL WAYNE JOYCE, No. 1:24-cv-00422 GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO COMPLETE IN FORMA PAUPERIS 13 v. APPLICATION FOR A NONPRISONER 14 ISMAIL PATEL, PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION FOR A NONPRISONER DUE 15 Defendant. IN THIRTY DAYS 16 17 18 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this 19 civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 20 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On December 16, 2024, Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address with the Court. ECF 22 No. 9. The address appears to be a private one, likely indicating that Plaintiff is no longer 23 incarcerated.1 24 Upon release from prison, a former inmate must be allowed to apply to proceed under 25 general in forma pauperis provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). See DeBlasio v. Gilmore, 315 26 F.3d 396, 399 (4th Cir. 2003); In re Prison Litigation Reform Act, 105 F.3d 1131, 1139 (6th Cir. 27 1 If the Court is incorrect, and Plaintiff is still, in fact, incarcerated, he must inform the Court 28 immediately. 1 1997) (upon release, obligation to pay remainder of fees to be determined solely on question of 2 whether individual qualifies for pauper status). A released prisoner may proceed in forma 3 pauperis upon satisfying the poverty provisions applicable to non-prisoners. McGann v. 4 Comm’r, Soc. Sec. Admin., 96 F.3d 29, 30 (2d Cir. 1996). 5 For these reasons, Plaintiff will be ordered to complete and file an application to proceed 6 in forma pauperis by a non-prisoner. Plaintiff will be given thirty days to do so. 7 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 8 1. The Clerk of Court shall send Plaintiff a copy of the Court’s application to proceed in 9 forma pauperis for a non-prisoner, and 10 2. Within thirty days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall complete and file the non- 11 prisoner in forma pauperis application with the Court. 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14

15 Dated: February 5, 2025 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
(PC) Joyce v. Patel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pc-joyce-v-patel-caed-2025.