(PC) Jones v. Cooper

District Court, E.D. California·Decided September 6, 2024·No. 2:23-cv-00817·Unknown

Opinion

PHILIP JOHN JONES, No. 2:23-cv-0817-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER Defendant. Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On May 22, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. (ECF No. 14.) The time to file objections has passed, and no objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. The findings and recommendations, filed on May 22, 2024 (ECF No. 14), are ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice; and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Date: September 5, 2024 ’ /) Say Yeshe Troy L. Nuhlep> ] United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Jones v. Cooper, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

(PC) Jones v. Cooper ((PC) Jones v. Cooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alumino-Thermic Corp. v. Goldschmidt Thermit Co.
25 F.2d 206 (Third Circuit, 1928)