(PC) Jones v. Bal

Opinion

GREGORY JONES, No. 2:19-cv-1971-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER INDERPAL BAL, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On July 30, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. (ECF No. 93.) The time to file objections has passed, and no objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. The findings and recommendations, filed on July 30, 2024 (ECF No. 93), are ADOPTED IN FULL; 2. The Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 79); and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. Date: September 5, 2024 /) i (. Take Wl Troy L. Nunley” . } United States District Judge