(PC) Jolivette v. People of California
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 Paul Patrick Jolivette, No. 2:21-cv-00382-KJM-EFB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 Vv. 14 People of California, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 The court construes the objections at ECF No. 33 as a motion to alter or amend the 18 judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59. See Am. Ironworks & Erectors, Inc. v. N. 19 Am. Constr. Corp., 248 F.3d 892, 898-99 (9th Cir. 2001). The motion, so construed, is denied. 20 See Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty., Or., v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262-63 (9th Cir. 21 1993) (listing factors for reconsideration under Rule 59(e)). 23 DATED: February 22, 2022.
CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PC) Jolivette v. People of California ((PC) Jolivette v. People of California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.