(PC) Howell v. Burns

Opinion

KAREEM HOWELL, No. 1:19-cv-000556-DAD-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE UNDER FED. R. CIV. v. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) J. BURNS, FNU MAGALLANES; (Doc. No. 45) Defendants. ORDER TERMINATING MOTIONS (Doc. Nos. 26, 31, 43) On February 10, 2021, the parties’ filed a “Joint Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with Prejudice,” stipulating to dismissal of this action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with prejudice, noting that the parties have resolved the case in its entirety and stating each party will bear their own attorneys’ fees and litigation costs. See Doc. No. 45. Considering the parties’ Joint Stipulation under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this case is dismissed with prejudice. See Id.; see also Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. Pursuant to the parties’ Joint Stipulation (Doc. No. 45) this is action is dismissed with prejudice. 2. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate any pending motions (Doc. Nos. 26,31, 43) and deadlines, and close this case. ; IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _ February 11, 2021 Mle fareh Yack HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE