(PC) Hoch v. Clendenin
This text of (PC) Hoch v. Clendenin ((PC) Hoch v. Clendenin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CORY HOCH, 1:23-cv-00796-SKO 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION 13 v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
14 STEPHANIE CLENDENIN, et al., (Doc. 2) 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 19 § 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. 20 are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. 21 Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). 22 In the instant action, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 2.) 23 Examination of the application reveals that Plaintiff is unable to afford the costs of this action. 24 Accordingly, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 Dated: May 30, 2023 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
(PC) Hoch v. Clendenin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pc-hoch-v-clendenin-caed-2023.