(PC) Hester v. Clendenin

District Court, E.D. California·Decided November 10, 2020·No. 1:20-cv-01569·Unknown

Opinion

WILLIAM HESTER, Case No. 1:20-cv-01569-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS v. (ECF No. 2) CLENDENIN, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff William Hester (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, filed November 6, 2020. (ECF No. 2.) Examination of these documents reveals that Plaintiff is unable to afford the costs of this action. Accordingly, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis, (ECF No. 2), is HEREBY GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 10, 2020 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Hester v. Clendenin, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

(PC) Hester v. Clendenin ((PC) Hester v. Clendenin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Page v. Torrey
201 F.3d 1136 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)