(PC) Hesse v. County of Sacramento

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedJanuary 17, 2024
Docket2:21-cv-01931
StatusUnknown

This text of (PC) Hesse v. County of Sacramento ((PC) Hesse v. County of Sacramento) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
(PC) Hesse v. County of Sacramento, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL HESSE, No. 2:21-cv-1931 WBS KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a former county jail inmate, proceeding in forma pauperis. At the time the 18 pending motions for summary judgment were filed, plaintiff was represented by counsel. Since 19 then, counsel was granted leave to withdraw. Because plaintiff was previously represented by 20 counsel, plaintiff has not received notice of the requirements for opposing a motion for summary 21 judgment. Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc); Klingele v. 22 Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988). Therefore, plaintiff is provided such notice by this 23 order, and grants plaintiff an extension of time to comply with the December 29, 2023 order. 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 25 1. Unless otherwise ordered, all motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgment, 26 motions concerning discovery, motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7, 11, 12, 15, 41, 55, 56, 59 27 and 60, and E.D. Cal. R. 110, shall be briefed pursuant to L.R. 230(l). Failure to timely oppose 28 //// 1 such a motion may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. See L.R. 230(l). Opposition 2 to all other motions need be filed only as directed by the court. 3 2. Pursuant to Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc), and 4 Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), the court hereby informs plaintiff of the 5 following requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 56. Such a motion is a request for an order for judgment in favor of the defendant without trial. 7 A defendant’s motion for summary judgment will set forth the facts that the defendant contends 8 are not reasonably subject to dispute and that entitle the defendant to judgment. To oppose a 9 motion for summary judgment, plaintiff must show proof of his or her claims. Plaintiff may do 10 this in one or more of the following ways. Plaintiff may rely on plaintiff’s statements made under 11 penalty of perjury in the complaint if the complaint shows that plaintiff has personal knowledge 12 of the matters stated and plaintiff specifies those parts of the complaint on which plaintiff relies. 13 Plaintiff may serve and file one or more affidavits or declarations setting forth the facts that 14 plaintiff believes prove plaintiff’s claims; the person who signs an affidavit or declaration must 15 have personal knowledge of the facts stated. Plaintiff may rely on written records, but plaintiff 16 must prove that the records are what plaintiff asserts they are. Plaintiff may rely on all or any part 17 of the transcript of one or more depositions, answers to interrogatories, or admissions obtained in 18 this proceeding. If plaintiff fails to contradict the defendant’s evidence with counteraffidavits or 19 other admissible evidence, the court may accept defendant’s evidence as true and grant the 20 motion. If there is some good reason why such facts are not available to plaintiff when required 21 to oppose a motion for summary judgment, the court will consider a request to postpone 22 consideration of the defendant’s motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(d). If plaintiff does not serve and 23 file a written opposition to the motion, or a request to postpone consideration of the motion, the 24 court may consider the failure to act as a waiver of opposition to the defendant’s motion. See 25 L.R. 230(l). If the court grants the motion for summary judgment, whether opposed or 26 unopposed, judgment will be entered for the defendant without a trial and the case will be closed 27 as to that defendant. 28 //// 1 3. If defendant moves for summary judgment, defendant must contemporaneously serve 2 || with the motion, but in a separate document, a copy of the attached Rand Notice. See Woods v. 3 || Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 935 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998). 4 | Failure to do so may constitute grounds for denial of the motion. 5 4. Unsigned affidavits or declarations will be stricken, and affidavits or declarations not 6 || signed under penalty of perjury have no evidentiary value. 7 5. Each party proceeding without counsel shall keep the court informed of a current 8 | address at all times while the action is pending. Any change of address must be reported 9 || promptly to the court in a separate document captioned for this case and entitled “Notice of 10 || Change of Address.” A notice of change of address must be properly served on other parties. 11 || Service of documents at the address of record for a party is fully effective. See L.R. 182(f). A 12 | party’s failure to inform the court of a change of address may result in the imposition of sanctions 13 || including dismissal of the action. 14 6. The failure of any party to comply with this order, the Federal Rules of Civil 15 || Procedure, or the Local Rules of Court, may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but 16 || not limited to, dismissal of the action or entry of default. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 17 7. Plaintiff granted fourteen days from the date of this order to respond to the 18 || December 29, 2023 order to show cause (ECF No. 59); and 19 8. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order to file an opposition to 20 | defendant Dr. Sanga’s motion for summary judgment or, if appropriate, file a motion under Rule 21 || 56(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 22 || Dated: January 16, 2024 Aectl Aharon 24 KENDALL J. NE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 /hess193 L.eot.p8 26 27 28

Rand Notice to Plaintiff This notice is provided to ensure that you, a pro se prisoner plaintiff, “have fair, timely and adequate notice of what is required” to oppose a motion for summary judgment. See Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 1998). The court requires that you be provided with this notice regarding the requirements for opposing a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. When a defendant moves for summary judgment, the defendant is requesting that the court grant judgment in defendant’s favor without a trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
(PC) Hesse v. County of Sacramento, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pc-hesse-v-county-of-sacramento-caed-2024.