(PC) Hendrix v. Arce

District Court, E.D. California·Decided September 14, 2020·No. 1:20-cv-01307·Unknown

Opinion

BENJAMIN HENDRIX, No. 2:20-cv-1479 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER F. FOULK, Warden, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 29, 2020, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. On September 3, 2020, plaintiff filed a request for extension of time to file an amended complaint, and also submitted an amended complaint (ECF No. 13). Plaintiff’s amended complaint was handed to prison staff for mailing on August 27, 2020.1 Therefore, his amended complaint was timely filed, and no extension of time is necessary. Thus, plaintiff’s motion is denied. In his amended complaint, plaintiff alleges violations of his civil rights by defendants at North Kern State Prison. The alleged violations took place in Kern County, which is part of the

1 “[T[he Houston mailbox rule applies to § 1983 complaints filed by pro se prisoners.” Douglas v. Noelle, 567 F.3d 1103, 1109 (9th Cir. 2009), citing Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 275-76 (1988). wOoOe LOU UV EVR MVUUMETPOTIL oor PO Ve eer PAY ev

Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120¢d). Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. In light of 1996 amendments to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, this court will not rule on plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's motion for extension of time (ECF No. 11) is denied; 2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and 3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at: United States District Court Eastern District of California 2500 Tulare Street Fresno, CA 93721 Dated: September 14, 2020 i Aectl Aharon mnend1479.22 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Hendrix v. Arce, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

(PC) Hendrix v. Arce ((PC) Hendrix v. Arce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Houston v. Lack
487 U.S. 266 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Douglas v. Noelle
567 F.3d 1103 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)