(PC) Harris v. Valladolid

• Court: District Court, E.D. California
• Decided: January 7, 2025
• Docket: 1:23-cv-01502
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 MUJAAHID F. HARRIS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01502-JLT-EPG (PC)

10 Plaintiff,

11 v. ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO EXCHANGE DOCUMENTS 12 VALLADOLID, et al., 13 Defendant(s). 14 15 Mujaahid F. Harris (Plaintiff) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 16 pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 17 On November 18, 2024, the Court issued an order requiring the parties to file 18 scheduling and discovery statements. (ECF No. 21). The parties have now filed their 19 statements. (ECF Nos. 25 & 26). 20 The Court has reviewed this case and the parties’ statements. In an effort to secure the 21 just, speedy, and inexpensive disposition of this action,1 the Court will direct that certain 22 documents that are central to the dispute be promptly produced.2

23 1 See, e.g., United States v. W.R. Grace, 526 F.3d 499, 508–09 (9th Cir. 2008) (“We begin with 24 the principle that the district court is charged with effectuating the speedy and orderly administration of 25 justice. There is universal acceptance in the federal courts that, in carrying out this mandate, a district court has the authority to enter pretrial case management and discovery orders designed to ensure that 26 the relevant issues to be tried are identified, that the parties have an opportunity to engage in appropriate discovery and that the parties are adequately and timely prepared so that the trial can proceed efficiently 27 and intelligibly.”). 2 Advisory Committee Notes to 1993 Amendment to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure regarding 28 Rule 26(a) (“The enumeration in Rule 26(a) of items to be disclosed does not prevent a court from 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 2 1. Each party has sixty days from the date of service of this order to serve opposing 3 parties, or their counsel, if represented, with copies of the following documents 4 and/or evidence that they have in their possession, custody, or control, to the 5 extent the parties have not already done so.3 This order applies to all documents 6 including confidential documents. Moreover, the parties are required to produce 7 these documents, or lodge objections as described below, without awaiting a 8 discovery request. 9 a. Documents regarding exhaustion of Plaintiff’s claims, including 602s, 10 Form 22s, and responses from the appeals office. 11 b. Healthcare Grievance #COR HC 21001165 (Institutional and 12 Headquarters Level Response) and 602 “Staff Complaint” #0307260. 13 (ECF No. 25 at 3; ECF No. 26 at 3). 14 c. All documents regarding the Rules Violation Report associated with the 15 incident(s) alleged in the complaint, including disciplinary charges and 16 findings, Rules Violation Report Package, Log Number 7222668, and 17 RVR #072226684. (ECF No. 25 at 3, ECF No. 26 at 3). 18 d. Witness statements and evidence that were generated from 19 investigation(s) related to the event(s) at issue in the complaint, such as 20 21

22 requiring by order or local rule that the parties disclose additional information without a discovery 23 request.”). 3 Defense counsel is requested to obtain these documents from Plaintiff’s institution(s) of 24 confinement. If defense counsel is unable to do so, defense counsel should inform Plaintiff that a third 25 party subpoena is required. 4 Plaintiff’s discovery statement refers to this document and Incident Report #044970 before 26 discussing an incident in which he was allegedly charged with battery on a peace officer in the Superior Court of California and “suffered a SHU Term, additional points which increased [Plaintiff’s] custody 27 level.” (ECF No. 26 at 5). Plaintiff states that he was charged on March 20, 2024, which is after the incidents alleged in Plaintiff’s operative complaint. Both parties are advised that only documents 28 relevant to the incident(s) alleged in Plaintiff’s operative complaint must be disclosed. 2 1 an investigation stemming from the processing of Plaintiff’s 2 grievance(s).5 3 e. Incident reports regarding the use of force incident(s) alleged in the 4 complaint, including Incident Report Package, Log Number 44970, and 5 Incident Report #044970. (ECF No. 25 at 3; ECF No. 26 at 3). 6 f. All of Plaintiff’s medical records related to the incident(s) and/or 7 condition(s) at issue in the case, including Plaintiff’s CDCR medical 8 records, Telemed2U Evaluation of Surgeon, February 4, 2022, Second 9 Opinion Progress Note from Riverside Hospital, November 22, 2022, 10 Healthcare Memorandum from Chief Medical Executive of Corcoran in 11 Response to Prison Law Office Attorney Patrick Booth’s Questions 12 Concerning Plaintiff’s Care of Treatment Plan After September 13, 2022 13 Injury, dated December 5, 2022, Operative Notes of Shoulder Surgery, 14 June 12, 2023, and X-Ray Results Showing Dislocated Prosthesis as a 15 Result of Physical Therapy Following Surgery, December 28, 2023. 16 (ECF No. 25 at 3, ECF No. 26 at 3). 17 g. Video recordings and photographs related to the incident(s) at issue in 18 the complaint, including video recordings and photographs of Plaintiff 19 and Defendant(s) taken following the incident(s).6 20 21 22 5 See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 94–95 (2006) (“[P]roper exhaustion improves the quality of those prisoner suits that are eventually filed because proper exhaustion often results in the creation of 23 an administrative record that is helpful to the court. When a grievance is filed shortly after the event giving rise to the grievance, witnesses can be identified and questioned while memories are still fresh, 24 and evidence can be gathered and preserved.”). 25 The Court notes that Defendant(s) only need to produce documents such as a Confidential Appeal Inquiry or a Use of Force Critique to the extent those documents contain witness statements 26 related to the incident(s) alleged in the complaint and/or evidence related to the incident(s) alleged in the complaint that will not be provided to Plaintiff separately. 27 6 If Plaintiff is not allowed possess, or is unable to play, video recording(s), defense counsel shall work with staff at Plaintiff’s institution of confinement to ensure that Plaintiff is able to view the 28 video recording(s). 3 1 h. A copy of all documents, electronically stored information, and tangible 2 things that the disclosing party has in its possession, custody, or control 3 and may use to support its claims or defenses, unless the use would be 4 solely for impeachment. 5 2. If any party obtains documents and/or other evidence described above later in 6 the case (including, but not limited to, documents and/or other evidence from a 7 third party), that party shall provide all other parties with copies of the 8 documents and/or evidence within thirty days. The failure of a party to comply 9 with this requirement may result, among other things, in the party not being able 10 to rely on the pertinent information later in the case. 11 3. Parties do not need to produce documents or evidence that they have already 12 produced. 13 4. Parties do not need to produce documents or evidence that were provided to 14 them by the opposing party. 15 5. Parties may object to producing any of the above-listed documents and/or 16 evidence.7 Objections shall be filed with the Court and served on all other 17 parties within sixty days from the date of service of this order (or within thirty 18 days of receiving additional documents and/or evidence). The objection should 19 include the basis for not providing the documents and/or evidence. If 20 Defendant(s) object based on the official information privilege, Defendant(s) 21 shall follow the procedures described in the Court’s scheduling order. 22 \\\ 23 \\\ 24 \\\ 25 \\\ 26 27 7 Plaintiff’s discovery statement requests discovery items from Defendants. (ECF No. 26 at 3- 4). If Plaintiff wishes for Defendants to provide the documents indicated in his discovery statement, 28 Plaintiff may serve Defendants with a separate discovery request for those documents. 4 1 If a party files an objection, all other parties have fourteen days from the date the 2 objection is filed to file a response. If any party files a response to an objection, the 3 Court will issue a ruling on the objection. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 |! Dated: _ January 6, 2025 [see hey 7 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28