(PC) Hand v. Young

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedFebruary 18, 2021
Docket1:20-cv-00784
StatusUnknown

This text of (PC) Hand v. Young ((PC) Hand v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
(PC) Hand v. Young, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEHU HAND, Case No. 1:20-cv-00784-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AS 13 v. MOOT, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RE- FILING 14 YOUNG, et al., (ECF Nos. 3, 11, 12, 16) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Jehu Hand (“Plaintiff”) is a former federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in 18 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of 19 Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 20 Currently pending before the Court are several motions for preliminary injunction and 21 related motions for expedited and emergency hearings on those motions. (ECF Nos. 3, 11, 12, 22 16.) The objective of all of the motions is Plaintiff’s release from prison and placement on 23 supervised release to protect him from the COVID-19 virus. (Id.) 24 On February 4, 2021, Plaintiff’s address was updated pursuant to a Notice of Change of 25 Address filed in Case No. 1:19-cv-01329-HBK (Doc. No. 27). The Court takes judicial notice of 26 that filing, which indicates that Plaintiff is now receiving mail at a P.O. Box not associated with a 27 federal correctional institution. 28 /// 1 As it appears Plaintiff has been released from custody, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s 2 pending motions related to his requests for emergency release from custody are now moot. To 3 the extent Plaintiff is reincarcerated, the motions are denied without prejudice to re-filing. The 4 Court will screen Plaintiff’s complaint in due course. 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 6 1. Plaintiff’s motion for emergency release, (ECF No. 3), is DENIED as moot, without 7 prejudice to re-filing; 8 2. Plaintiff’s first amended emergency motion for expedited preliminary injunction, (ECF 9 No. 11), is DENIED as moot, without prejudice to re-filing; 10 3. Plaintiff’s motion to set hearing on the emergency motion for preliminary injunction, 11 (ECF No. 12), is DENIED as moot; and 12 4. Plaintiff’s declaration in support of first amended emergency motion for expedited 13 release, (ECF No. 16), is DENIED as moot. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15

16 Dated: February 18, 2021 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
(PC) Hand v. Young, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pc-hand-v-young-caed-2021.