(PC) Hammler v. Grubbs

District Court, E.D. California·Decided April 11, 2024·No. 2:23-cv-02770·Unknown

Opinion

ALLEN HAMMLER, No. 2:23-cv-2770-DJC-KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DEMITRIOUS GRUBBS, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 06, 2024, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations (ECF No. 17) are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 16) is denied; and 3. This matter is referred back to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all further pretrial proceedings. Dated: _ April 2024 “Daniel . CoD tto— Hon. Daniel It |. Cod UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE amm23cv2770.801

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Hammler v. Grubbs, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

(PC) Hammler v. Grubbs ((PC) Hammler v. Grubbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donald Milton Orand v. United States
602 F.2d 207 (Ninth Circuit, 1979)