(PC) Haggerty v. Lynch

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedApril 1, 2025
Docket2:21-cv-01248
StatusUnknown

This text of (PC) Haggerty v. Lynch ((PC) Haggerty v. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
(PC) Haggerty v. Lynch, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEE E. HAGGERTY, No. 2:21-cv-01248-DJC-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 JEFF LYNCH, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ request for an extension to file their 19 pretrial statement until fourteen days after Plaintiff submits his pretrial statement. 20 (ECF No. 59). Pursuant to the Scheduling Order issued on October 3, 2024, Plaintiff 21 was ordered to file and serve a pretrial statement on or before March 20, 2025, and 22 Defendants were ordered to file their pretrial statement on or before April 3, 2025. 23 (ECF No. 54.) However, as of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has not filed his pretrial 24 statement. 25 The district court has broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of 26 litigation. Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992) 27 (citation omitted). Under Rule 16(b), “[a] schedule may be modified only for good 28 cause and with the judge’s consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). “The schedule may be 1 | modified if it cannot be reasonably met despite the diligence of the party seeking the 2 | extension.” Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison Co., 302 F.3d 1080, 1087 (9th Cir. 3 | 2002) (citation and quotation marks omitted). 4 The Court finds good cause exists here as Plaintiff has yet to file his pretrial 5 | statement. Thus, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ request for an extension to file the 6 | pretrial statement on or by April 7, 2025. The Court will address the Plaintiff's failure 7 | to file a pretrial statement at the final pretrial conference. Defendants are further 8 | GRANTED leave to amend their statement following Plaintiff's submission to review 9 | and, if necessary, address matters raised in Plaintiff's pretrial statement. 10 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ request for an extension 11 | is GRANTED to file the pretrial statement on or before April 7, 2025, with leave to 12 | amend. 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 | Dated: _April 1, 2025 “Daniel CoD tto— Hon. Daniel □□ |. Cod 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 | DJC6- HAGGERTY21cv01248.extension 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
(PC) Haggerty v. Lynch, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pc-haggerty-v-lynch-caed-2025.