(PC) Gray v. Khoo

E.D. California

(PC) Gray v. Khoo

DecidedJanuary 25, 2022

Docket1:20-cv-01047

StatusUnknown

This text of (PC) Gray v. Khoo ((PC) Gray v. Khoo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

(PC) Gray v. Khoo, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 DANA GRAY, Case No. 1: 20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S FILING OF 13 v. NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT B. SHOWALTER 14 A. KHOO, et al., (ECF No. 60) 15 Defendants. FIVE DAY DEADLINE 16 17 On January 21, 2022, Plaintiff filed a notice that Plaintiff is releasing Defendant B. 18 Showalter as a defendant in this action. (ECF No. 60.) 19 Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all 20 of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 21 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The 22 plaintiff may dismiss either some or all of the defendants—or some or all of his claims—through 23 a Rule 41(a)(1) notice.”)); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 687 24 (9th Cir. 2005) (The Ninth Circuit has “only extended the rule to allow the dismissal of all claims 25 against one defendant, so that a defendant may be dismissed from the entire action.”). However, 26 a notice of dismissal filed only by a plaintiff is effective only as to defendants who have not yet 27 appeared in the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i)-(ii). If a defendant has appeared, the action is dismissed through the filing of a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have 1 | appeared. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi). Otherwise, “an action may be dismissed at the 2 | plaintiff's request only by court order, on terms that the court considers proper.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 3 | 41(a)(2). The Court shall order Defendants to signify whether they join and consent in the 4 | Plaintiffs filing, and if so, the Court will then give effect to the filing as a stipulation pursuant to 5 | Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A) Gi). 6 Accordingly, within five days of entry of this order, Defendants shall notify the Court 7 | whether they join and consent in Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal filed on January 21, 8 | 2022. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. DAM Le 11 | Dated: _January 24, 2022 __ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 DANA GRAY, Case No. 1: 20-cv-01047-DAD-SAB (PC)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S FILING OF 13 v. NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT B. SHOWALTER 14 A. KHOO, et al., (ECF No. 60) 15 Defendants. FIVE DAY DEADLINE 16 17 On January 21, 2022, Plaintiff filed a notice that Plaintiff is releasing Defendant B. 18 Showalter as a defendant in this action. (ECF No. 60.) 19 Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all 20 of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 21 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997); see also Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The 22 plaintiff may dismiss either some or all of the defendants—or some or all of his claims—through 23 a Rule 41(a)(1) notice.”)); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 687 24 (9th Cir. 2005) (The Ninth Circuit has “only extended the rule to allow the dismissal of all claims 25 against one defendant, so that a defendant may be dismissed from the entire action.”). However, 26 a notice of dismissal filed only by a plaintiff is effective only as to defendants who have not yet 27 appeared in the action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i)-(ii). If a defendant has appeared, the action is dismissed through the filing of a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have 1 | appeared. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi). Otherwise, “an action may be dismissed at the 2 | plaintiff's request only by court order, on terms that the court considers proper.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 3 | 41(a)(2). The Court shall order Defendants to signify whether they join and consent in the 4 | Plaintiffs filing, and if so, the Court will then give effect to the filing as a stipulation pursuant to 5 | Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A) Gi). 6 Accordingly, within five days of entry of this order, Defendants shall notify the Court 7 | whether they join and consent in Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal filed on January 21, 8 | 2022. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. DAM Le 11 | Dated: _January 24, 2022 __ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

(PC) Gray v. Khoo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pc-gray-v-khoo-caed-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack