(PC) Good v. California State Prison - Solano

Opinion

RAVON GOOD, No. 2:21-cv-01653-TLN-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER CSP-SOLANO, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 29, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). /// Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed July 29, 2022 (ECF No. 12), are ADOPTED in full; and 2. Defendants CSP-Solano and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation are DISMISSED from this action. DATED: September 19, 2022 /) “ \/ Lu ao ZN a _Z \ Troy L. Nunley } United States District Judge