(PC) Gonzalez v. Wise

E.D. California

(PC) Gonzalez v. Wise

District Court, E.D. California·Decided October 24, 2023·No. 1:23-cv-01501·Unknown

Opinion

MICHAEL HERNANDEZ GONZALEZ, Case No. 1:23-cv-01501-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO v. ACTION WISE, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE Defendants. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE DENIED (ECF No. 2) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE Plaintiff Michael Hernandez Gonzalez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on October 23, 2023, together with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) On October 24, 2023, Plaintiff filed a certified copy of his prison trust account statement. (ECF No. 6.) Examination of Plaintiff’s trust account statement reveals that Plaintiff is able to afford the costs of this action. Specifically, Plaintiff’s current available balance in his inmate trust account is $1,186.98. (ECF No. 6.) Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS the Clerk of the Court to randomly assign a District Judge to this action. Further, it is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: 1. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis, (ECF No. 2), be DENIED; and 2. Plaintiff be ORDERED to pay the $402.00 initial filing fee in full to proceed with this action. These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen (14) days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation.” Plaintiff is advised that the failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of the “right to challenge the magistrate’s factual findings” on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)). IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 24, 2023 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MICHAEL HERNANDEZ GONZALEZ, Case No. 1:23-cv-01501-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO v. ACTION WISE, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE Defendants. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE DENIED (ECF No. 2) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE Plaintiff Michael Hernandez Gonzalez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on October 23, 2023, together with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) On October 24, 2023, Plaintiff filed a certified copy of his prison trust account statement. (ECF No. 6.) Examination of Plaintiff’s trust account statement reveals that Plaintiff is able to afford the costs of this action. Specifically, Plaintiff’s current available balance in his inmate trust account is $1,186.98. (ECF No. 6.) Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS the Clerk of the Court to randomly assign a District Judge to this action. Further, it is HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: 1. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis, (ECF No. 2), be DENIED; and 2. Plaintiff be ORDERED to pay the $402.00 initial filing fee in full to proceed with this action. These Findings and Recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen (14) days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations, Plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation.” Plaintiff is advised that the failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of the “right to challenge the magistrate’s factual findings” on appeal. Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 (9th Cir. 1991)). IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 24, 2023 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

(PC) Gonzalez v. Wise, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Pincite

(PC) Gonzalez v. Wise ((PC) Gonzalez v. Wise) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related