(PC) Gonzalez v. Perez

District Court, E.D. California·Decided April 14, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-01447·Unknown

Opinion

MICHAEL HERNANDEZ GONZALEZ, No. 1:19-cv-1447-JLT (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR APPOINTMENT OF v. COUNSEL GUARD H. PEREZ, et al., (Docs. 4, 17, 19, 21, 22, 26) Defendants. Plaintiff has filed multiple motions for the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The court does not find the required exceptional circumstances in this case. Accordingly, the Court DENIES without prejudice plaintiff’s motions for the appointment of counsel. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: April 14, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Gonzalez v. Perez, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

(PC) Gonzalez v. Perez ((PC) Gonzalez v. Perez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related