(PC) Gittens v. Los Angeles County Superior Court

Opinion

DUANE ANGELO GITTENS No. 2:20-cv-00781-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT, et FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS al., Defendants.

By order filed June 4, 2020, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Following multiple extensions of time, that deadline has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign this matter to a district court judge. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: December 3, 2020 Pee a4 if / /, ; CAN fu fl. ay CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12/gitt078 1 .fta.docx