(PC) Garraway v. Ciufo

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedAugust 5, 2022
Docket1:17-cv-00533
StatusUnknown

This text of (PC) Garraway v. Ciufo ((PC) Garraway v. Ciufo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
(PC) Garraway v. Ciufo, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

Opinion

1 2

3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6 MITCHELL GARRAWAY, 1:17-cv-00533-DAD-GSA-PC

7 Plaintiff, ORDER CONTINUING TELEPHONIC TRIAL CONFIRMATION HEARING AND 8 vs. SETTING RELATED DEADLINES

9 JACQUILINE CIUFO, et al., From: Sept. 26, 2022 at 1:30 p.m.

10 Defendants. To: Oct. 17, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. Courtroom 5 (DAD) 11

12 Plaintiff’s Pretrial Statement Due: 9/5/22

13 Defendants’ Pretrial Statement Due: 10/5/22

14 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO SEND PLAINTIFF A COPY OF LOCAL RULE 281 15 Jury Trial: TO BE SCHEDULED 16

17 18 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE 19 1. The telephonic trial confirmation (TTCH) hearing scheduled for September 26, 20 2022 at 1:30 p.m. in this action is CONTINUED TO: 21 October 17, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. 22 Before District Judge Dale A. Drozd 23 In Courtroom 5 24 2. The parties shall appear at the TTCH with each party connecting remotely either 25 via Zoom video conference or Zoom telephone number. The parties will be 26 provided with the Zoom ID and password by Judge Drozd’s Courtroom Deputy 27 prior to the conference. The Zoom ID number and password are confidential and 28 are not to be shared. Appropriate court attire is required. 1 3. Counsel for Defendants is required to contact Plaintiff’s institution to arrange for 2 Plaintiff’s participation at the TTCH. Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding 3 pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. 4 Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). 5 This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s original Complaint filed on April 17, 2017, 6 against defendants Jacqueline Ciufo (Unit Manager), K. Miller (Corrections Officer), and 7 Lieutenant J. Zaragoza (collectively, “Defendants”), for failure to protect Plaintiff in violation of 8 the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.) 9 On November 27, 2018, the court issued a Discovery and Scheduling Order establishing 10 deadlines for the parties, including a discovery deadline of May 27, 2019, and a dispositive 11 motion filing deadline of July 27, 2019. (ECF No. 26.) All of the deadlines have now expired, 12 and no motions are pending. On May 25, 2021 at 9:30 a.m., a settlement conference was held 13 before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone, but the case did not settle. (ECF No. 131.) Therefore, 14 pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court will, by this order, set 15 a further schedule for this litigation. 16 The parties are required to file pretrial statements in accordance with the schedule set 17 forth herein. In addition to the matters already required to be addressed in the pretrial statement 18 in accordance with Local Rule 281, Plaintiff will be required to make a particularized showing 19 in order to obtain the attendance of witnesses. The procedures and requirements for making such 20 a showing are outlined in detail below. Plaintiff is advised that failure to comply with the 21 procedures set forth below may result in the preclusion of any and all witnesses named in 22 his pretrial statement. 23 At the trial of this case, Plaintiff must be prepared to introduce evidence to prove each of 24 the alleged facts that support the claims raised in the lawsuit. In general, there are two kinds of 25 trial evidence: (1) exhibits and (2) the testimony of witnesses. It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to 26 produce all of the evidence to prove his case, whether that evidence is in the form of exhibits or 27 witness testimony. If Plaintiff wants to call witnesses to testify, he must follow certain 28 procedures to ensure that the witnesses will be at the trial and available to testify. 1 1. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to 2 Testify Voluntarily - An incarcerated witness who agrees voluntarily to attend trial to give 3 testimony cannot come to court unless this court orders the warden or other custodian to permit 4 the witness to be transported to court. This court will not issue such an order unless it is satisfied 5 that: (a) the prospective witness is willing to attend; and (b) the prospective witness has actual 6 knowledge of relevant facts. 7 A party intending to introduce the testimony of incarcerated witnesses who have agreed 8 voluntarily to attend the trial must serve and file concurrent with the pretrial statement a written 9 motion for a court order requiring that such witnesses be brought to court at the time of trial. The 10 motion must: (1) state the name, address, and prison or state hospital identification number of 11 each such witness; and (2) be accompanied by declarations showing that each witness is willing 12 to testify and that each witness has actual knowledge of relevant facts. The motion should be 13 entitled “Motion for Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses.” 14 The willingness of the prospective witness can be shown in one of two ways: (1) the party 15 himself can swear by declaration under penalty of perjury that the prospective witness has 16 informed the party that he or she is willing to testify voluntarily without being subpoenaed, in 17 which declaration the party must state when and where the prospective witness informed the 18 party of this willingness; or (2) the party can serve and file a declaration, signed under penalty of 19 perjury by the prospective witness, in which the witness states that he or she is willing to testify 20 without being subpoenaed. 21 The prospective witness’s actual knowledge of relevant facts can be shown in one of two 22 ways: (1) if the party has actual firsthand knowledge that the prospective witness was an 23 eyewitness or an ear-witness to the relevant facts (i.e., if an incident occurred in Plaintiff’s cell 24 and, at the time, Plaintiff saw that a cellmate was present and observed the incident, Plaintiff may 25 swear to the cellmate’s ability to testify), the party himself can swear by declaration under penalty 26 of perjury that the prospective witness has actual knowledge; or (2) the party can serve and file 27 a declaration signed under penalty of perjury by the prospective witness in which the witness 28 describes the relevant facts to which the prospective witness was an eye- or ear-witness. Whether 1 the declaration is made by the party or by the prospective witness, it must be specific about the 2 incident, when and where it occurred, who was present, and how the prospective witness 3 happened to be in a position to see or to hear what occurred at the time it occurred. 4 The court will review and rule on the motion for attendance of incarcerated witnesses, 5 specifying which prospective witnesses must be brought to court. Subsequently, the court will 6 issue the order necessary to cause the witness’s custodian to bring the witness to court. 7 Motions for the attendance of incarcerated witnesses, if any, must be filed on or 8 before September 5, 2022. Oppositions, if any, must be filed on or before October 5, 2022. 9 2. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Incarcerated Witnesses Who Refuse to 10 Testify Voluntarily - If a party seeks to obtain the attendance of incarcerated witnesses who 11 refuse to testify voluntarily, the party should submit with his pretrial statement a motion for the 12 attendance of such witnesses. Such motion should be in the form described above. In addition, 13 the party must indicate in the motion that the incarcerated witnesses are not willing to testify 14 voluntarily. 15 3. Procedures for Obtaining Attendance of Unincarcerated Witnesses Who Agree to 16 Testify Voluntarily - It is the responsibility of the party who has secured an unincarcerated 17 witness’s voluntary attendance to notify the witness of the time and date of trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
(PC) Garraway v. Ciufo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pc-garraway-v-ciufo-caed-2022.