(PC) Garbett v. Anderson

District Court, E.D. California·Decided January 13, 2020·No. 2:18-cv-01793·Unknown

Opinion

KARRICK M. GARBETT, No. 2:18-CV-1793-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JENNIFER SCHAFFER, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals the court's final judgment entered on September 30, 2019. The matter was referred to the undersigned by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to certify whether in forma pauperis status should continue on appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith, in which case in forma pauperis status would be revoked. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); see also Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002). Having reviewed the entire file, the court concludes in forma pauperis status should be revoked because the appeal is frivolous. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiffs in forma pauperis status should be revoked; and 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Pro Se Unit at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Dated: January 10, 2020 Ssvcqo_ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Garbett v. Anderson, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

(PC) Garbett v. Anderson ((PC) Garbett v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related