(PC) Gaddy v. Pfeiffer

• Court: District Court, E.D. California
• Decided: April 14, 2022
• Docket: 1:22-cv-00412
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 MICHAEL J. GADDY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00412-EPG

11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S 12 v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA 13 C. PFEIFFER, et al., PAUPERIS BE DENIED

14 Defendants. (ECF No. 2)

15 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN 16 TWENTY-ONE DAYS

17 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE 18

19 Plaintiff Michael J. Gaddy (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this 20 action. On April 11, 2022, Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action along with an 21 application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) 22 Plaintiff had $3,779.15 in his prison trust account at the time he filed his complaint. 23 (ECF No. 6.) Thus, it appears Plaintiff can afford to pay the filing fee. 24 Additionally, given that Plaintiff’s account balance has been over $3,700.00 for the 25 entirety of the last six months, it appears that Plaintiff would be required to pay the filing fee in 26 full immediately even if the Court granted Plaintiff’s application. (See ECF No. 6.) 28 U.S.C. 27 § 1915(b)(1) (“Notwithstanding subsection (a), if a prisoner brings a civil action or files an 28 1 |] appeal in forma pauperis, the prisoner shall be required to pay the full amount of a filing fee. 2 || The court shall assess and, when funds exist, collect, as a partial payment of any court fees 3 || required by law, an initial partial filing fee of 20 percent of the greater of-- (A) the average 4 ||monthly deposits to the prisoner’s account; or (B) the average monthly balance in the prisoner’s 5 || account for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint or notice of 6 || appeal.”). 7 Based on the foregoing, the Court will recommend that Plaintiffs application to 8 || proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that Plaintiff be required to pay the filing fee of 9 $402.00 for this action in full. 10 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is respectfully 11 || directed to randomly assign a district judge to this case. 12 Further, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: 13 1. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) be DENIED; 14 and 15 2. Plaintiff be directed to pay the $402.00 filing fee in full if he wants to proceed 16 with this action. 17 These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States district 18 || judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within 19 || twenty-one (21) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, Plaintiff 20 || may file written objections with the Court. The document should be captioned “Objections to 21 || Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file 22 || objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of rights on appeal. Wilkerson v. 23 || Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Baxter v. Sullivan, 923 F.2d 1391, 1394 24 || (9th Cir. 1991)). IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 |! Dated: _ April 14, 2022 [Je Fahy —— 27 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28