(PC) Fregia v. Chen

District Court, E.D. California·Decided August 7, 2023·No. 1:20-cv-01024·Unknown

Opinion

5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARK A. FREGIA, Case No. 1:20-cv-01024-ADA-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR AN 13 v. EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS AND 14 YUCUI CHEN, et al., RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. (ECF No. 111). 16

17 18 On August 2, 2023, Plaintiff filed a request for an extension of time to file objections to 19 the Court’s July 14, 2023 findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 111). Plaintiff states that he 20 received the Court’s findings and recommendations on July 20, 2023, and so he had until August 21 3, 2023, to file objections. (Id., p. 1). Plaintiff seeks an additional ten-day extension to file 22 objections. (Id., p. 2). Plaintiff apparently relies on the prison mailbox rule, which states that a 23 prisoner’s pleading or filing is “deemed filed when he hands it over to prison authorities for 24 mailing to the relevant court.” Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988); Huizar v. Carey, 273 25 F.3d 1220, 1222 (9th Cir. 2001). “The prison mailbox rule applies to outgoing legal filings or 26 documents sent by Plaintiff, not to incoming legal filings or documents served on Plaintiff.” Scott 27 v. Palmer, No. 1:09-cv-01329-LJO-SKO (PC), 2014 WL 6685813, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 26, 28 1 | 2014). Because the findings and recommendations were filed and conventionally served to 2 | Plaintiff on July 14, 2023, Plaintiffs objections were due July 31, 2023—not August 3, 2023. 3 | See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d) (extending service time by three days where service is made by mail). 4 | Based on this date, the Court will grant Plaintiff a ten-day extension to file objections to the 5 | Court’s findings and recommendations. 6 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 7 1. Plaintiff shall file his objections to the Court’s findings and recommendations (ECF No. 8 107) by no later than August 10, 2023. 2. In granting this extension, the Court does not extend Plaintiff's deadline to respond to ° Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. As ordered on July 14, 2023, Plaintiff shall file a response or statement of non-opposition to Defendants’ motion by no later than September 12, 2023. (See ECF No. 107, p. 12) (“Plaintiff shall file his opposition to 2 Defendants’ motion for summary judgment within sixty-days following the date of this 13 order.”’). 14 15 | IT IS SO ORDERED. | Dated: _ August 7, 2023 hey 17 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Fregia v. Chen, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

(PC) Fregia v. Chen ((PC) Fregia v. Chen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Houston v. Lack
487 U.S. 266 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. George Retos, Jr.
25 F.3d 1220 (Third Circuit, 1994)