(PC) Foster v. The State Department of State Hospitals

District Court, E.D. California·Decided January 25, 2022·No. 2:21-cv-01286·Unknown

Opinion

MARTIN LEE FOSTER, No. 2:21-cv-01286-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER HOSPITALS, Defendant.

Plaintiff, a county inmate proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 16, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 16, 2021, (ECF No. 6), are adopted in full; 2. Plaintiffs complaint is dismissed without leave to amend; and, 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. DATED: January 24, 2022 () ))

Troy L. Nuhlep ] United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Foster v. The State Department of State Hospitals, (E.D. Cal. 2022).

(PC) Foster v. The State Department of State Hospitals ((PC) Foster v. The State Department of State Hospitals) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johns-Manville, Inc. v. Pocker
26 F.2d 204 (Eighth Circuit, 1928)