(PC) Fletcher, Jr. v. United States

District Court, E.D. California·Decided April 3, 2025·No. 1:22-cv-00443·Unknown

Opinion

JOHNNY FLETCHER, JR., Case No. 1:22-cv-00443 JLT GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE v. ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO UNITED STATES, et al., CLOSE THIS CASE Defendants. (Doc. 13) Johnny Fletcher, Jr., asserts he suffered violations of his civil rights while incarcerated at USP Atwater, and seeks to hold the defendants liable under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). After Plaintiff was released from custody, the Court ordered him to complete an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 10.) Plaintiff did not respond to the Court’s order. The magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to obey the Court’s orders—including both the order regarding an application to proceed in forma pauperis and an order to show cause—and failed to prosecute this case. (Doc. 13 at 4.) The magistrate judge found terminating sanctions are appropriate after considering the factors identified by the Ninth Circuit in Malone v. United States Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987). (Id. at 3-6.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the Court dismiss the action without prejudice. (Id. at 6.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff and notified him that any objections were due within 14 days. (Doc. 13 at 6.) The Court advised him that the “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of certain rights on appeal.” Ud., citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014).) Plaintiff did not file objections, and the time to do so has passed. According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court performed a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 1. The Findings and Recommendations issued March 11, 2025 (Doc. 13) are ADOPTED in full. 2. This matter is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and for failure to obey court orders. 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. Dated: _ April 3, 2025 Charis [Tourn TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Fletcher, Jr. v. United States, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

(PC) Fletcher, Jr. v. United States ((PC) Fletcher, Jr. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related