(PC) Epperson v. Solano County Jail Medical

District Court, E.D. California·Decided September 22, 2021·No. 2:21-cv-00769·Unknown

Opinion

ALLEN DALE EPPERSON, III No. 2:21-cv-00769-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND SOLANO COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendant. By order filed August 3, 2021, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign this matter to a district court judge. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 1] time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). | Dated: September 22, 2021 Card Kt | La Ly (g— UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12/eppe0769.fta(1).docx

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Epperson v. Solano County Jail Medical, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

(PC) Epperson v. Solano County Jail Medical ((PC) Epperson v. Solano County Jail Medical) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related