(PC) Duque v. Alcazar

• Court: District Court, E.D. California
• Decided: May 11, 2021
• Docket: 2:21-cv-00523
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JASON ALLEN DUQUE, No. 2:21-cv-0523 JAM CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 MANNY ALCAZAR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed March 29, 2021, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis 18 application within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in dismissal. 19 The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 21 prejudice. 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 23 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 24 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 25 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 26 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 || time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YlIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 2 | Cir. 1991). 3 || Dated: May 11, 2021 a] Ld Ai. Cat pK. Ager 4 CAROLYNK.DELANEY / 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 9 duqu523.fifp 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28