(PC) Dresdner v. Sacramento County Jail

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 CHERYL D. DRESDNER, No. 2:23-cv-2038 DAD KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS SHERIFFS, 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 By order filed February 6, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave 19 to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and 20 plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 22 prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 23 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 24 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 25 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 26 with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 27 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that 28 failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District 1 |} Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 2 || Dated: March 19, 2024 Cad □ ft | Lz ae 3 CAROLYNK DELANEY 4 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 /dres2038.fta 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28