(PC) Doiel v. United States of America

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 MICHAEL ALLEN DOIEL, No. 2:20-CV-0602-TLN-DMC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action. The matter was 18 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. 19 On June 6, 2023, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 were served on the parties, and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within 21 the time specified therein. The parties have not filed any objections to the findings and 22 recommendations. 23 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 24 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 25 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 26 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). 27 Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 28 the record and by the proper analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 6, 2023 (ECF No. 56) are ADOPTED IN 3 FULL; 4 2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of prosecution and failure to 5 comply with Court rules and orders; and 6 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. 7 | Date: August 4, 2023 ° /) Thee

11 Troy L. Nuhlep> United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28