(PC) Doe v. State of California

District Court, E.D. California·Decided May 27, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-01382·Unknown

Opinion

1 ROB BONTA, State Bar No. 202668 GGLLEENNNN AAGGRREE BBEERRGGMMAANN && Attorney General of California FFUUEENNTTEESS LLLLPP 2 ALICIA A. BOWER, State Bar No. 287799 LLYYNN RR.. AAGGRREE ((CCAASSBBNN 117788221188)) Supervising Deputy Attorney General BBUURRKKEE SSTTRRUUNNSSKKYY ((CCAASSBBNN 3 JENNIFER BURNS, State Bar No. 312364 220033558822)) Deputy Attorney General 558800 CCaalliiffoorrnniiaa SSttrreeeett,, SSuuiittee 11442200 4 1300 I Street, Suite 125 SSaann FFrraanncciissccoo,, CCAA 9944110044 P.O. Box 944255 TTeelleepphhoonnee:: ((441155)) 559999--00888800 5 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 llaaggrree@@gglleennaaggrree..ccoomm Telephone: (916) 210-6393 bbssttrruunnsskkyy@@gglleennaaggrree..ccoomm 6 Fax: (916) 324-5205 E-mail: Jennifer.Burns@doj.ca.gov AAttttoorrnneeyyss ffoorr PPllaaiinnttiiffff 7 Attorneys for Defendants California Department of Corrections and 8 Rehabilitation, State of California, and J. Solorio

9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 FRESNO DIVISION 12 13 NICOLE DOE, Case No. 1:24-cv-01382-JLT-BAM 14 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] STIPULATED 15 PROTECTIVE ORDER v. 16 Judge: Hon. Barbara A. McAuliffe Trial Date: Not Set 17 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Action Filed: November 12, 2024 18 Defendants. 19 20 I. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 21 Plaintiff Nicole Doe and Defendants State of California, California Department of 22 Corrections and Rehabilitation, and J. Solorio (“the Parties”) stipulate to the entry of a protective 23 order to facilitate the exchange of information to further evaluate Plaintiff’s claims and for the 24 parties to determine whether this matter may be appropriate for early ADR.1 Additionally, 25 disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, 26 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from 27 use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted.

28 1 The undersigned counsel does not represent Defendant Rodriguez. 1 The material anticipated to be exchanged under this protective order includes confidential 2 information or materials related to Plaintiff’s allegations and claims in this matter, including, but 3 not limited to: (1) investigation files; (2) confidential prison records; (3) medical records; and (4) 4 personal identifying information of the parties including the identity of Nicole Doe. In addition, 5 the materials anticipated to be exchanged, if revealed publicly, could compromise future 6 investigations or prevention of criminal activity as investigative methods, practices, or procedures 7 could be revealed. Moreover, redaction of non-party names and matters pertaining to non-parties 8 is necessary to protect their privacy and prevent embarrassment due to the sensitive nature of the 9 investigation (alleged sexual assaults, sexual harassment, and sexual misconduct). Accordingly, a 10 protective order is necessary for the following reasons: (1) to protect confidential information; (2) 11 to protect the privacy of correctional staff and Plaintiff and other inmates with regard to portions 12 of their prison records that are not relevant to the incident at issue; (3) to protect Plaintiff’s patient 13 privacy and HIPAA-protected health information; and (4) to protect the safety and security 14 interests of CDCR and inmates and in not having the materials misused, misinterpreted, or 15 manipulated by the general public. 16 This protective order is without prejudice to any objections that may be raised by the parties 17 or other protective orders the Court or parties deem necessary or request, should this case proceed 18 to formal discovery. 19 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate and petition the court to enter the following 20 Stipulated Protective Order. This protective order does not confer blanket protections on all 21 disclosures or responses to discovery and the protection it affords from public disclosure and use 22 extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under 23 the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in E.D. Cal. Civ. 24 L.R. 141.1, that this protective order does not entitle them to file confidential information under 25 seal and that E.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the 26 standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under 27 seal. 28 / / / 1 2. DEFINITIONS 2 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 3 information or items under this order. 4 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 5 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule 6 of Civil Procedure 26(c). 7 2.3 Counsel: Counsel of Record for the parties and CDCR Office of Legal Affairs (OLA) 8 attorneys, including their supervisors, as well as their support staff. 9 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 10 produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY 11 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 12 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium 13 or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, 14 testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or 15 responses to discovery in this matter. 16 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the 17 litigation who (1) has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 18 consultant in this action, (2) is not a past or current employee of a Party or of a Party’s 19 competitor, and (3) at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party 20 or of a Party’s competitor. 21 2.7 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items: 22 extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items,” disclosure of which to another Party or 23 Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm, cause embarrassment to a non-party, or 24 invade the privacy of a non –party, that could not be avoided by less restrictive means. 25 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 26 entity not named as a Party to this action. 27 2.9 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 28 consultants, retained experts, and Counsel (and their support staffs). 1 2.10 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 2 Material in this action. 3 2.11 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., 4 photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, 5 storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 6 2.12 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 7 “CONFIDENTIAL,” or as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 8 2.13 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 9 Producing Party. 10 3. SCOPE 11 The protections conferred by this order cover not only Protected Material (as defined 12 above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, 13 excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, 14 or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Doe v. State of California, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

(PC) Doe v. State of California ((PC) Doe v. State of California) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)