(PC) Daniels v. Moreno

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ||] CHARLES DANIELS, CDCR #AA-4443,) Case No.: 22-cv-1263-JO-KSC 12 Plant, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 13 |] Vv. LIMITED DISCOVERY 14 || A. MORENO, et al., DOC. NO. 23 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Limited Discovery in which he requests “the Court 18 approve an address / P.O. Box or .. . [other legitimate] address” in order for him to serve 19 || his Summons and Complaint on defendant Dr. Erguel. Doc. No. 23. “[T]he Court [is] not 20 || permitted to conduct investigatory efforts on behalf of plaintiff.” Ponce v. Gale, No. EDCV 21 || 12-2184-GW JEM, 2014 WL 7381735, at *5 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 24, 2014). Plaintiff's Motion 22, therefore, DENIED. 23 || Dated: March 14, 2024 Yy JA 24 Mle Hh ST 95 Hot . Karen S. Crawford United States Magistrate Judge 26 27 28