(PC) Connor v. CDCR

District Court, E.D. California·Decided November 5, 2020·No. 2:19-cv-02088·Unknown

Opinion

BARBARA A. CONNOR, No. 2:19-cv-02088-TLN-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants.

Plaintiff Barbara A. Connor (“Plaintiff”), a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 22, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Accordingly, the court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed September 22, 2020 (ECF No. 11), are adopted in full; 2. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 9) is DISMISSED without leave to amend; and 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. DATED: November 4, 2020

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Connor v. CDCR, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

(PC) Connor v. CDCR ((PC) Connor v. CDCR) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donald Milton Orand v. United States
602 F.2d 207 (Ninth Circuit, 1979)