(PC) Colbourn v. California Courts

District Court, E.D. California·Decided July 15, 2020·No. 2:20-cv-00725·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 ORRIN TYLER COLBOURN, No. 2:20-CV-0725 DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 CALIFORNIA COURTS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking 18 relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1). The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 Plaintiff has filed a request for a temporary restraining order. (ECF No. 29). A review of 21 the motion indicates that plaintiff seeks injunctive relief against individuals who are not named as 22 defendants in this action. (Compare ECF No. 1 at 1, 3 (defendants named in complaint), with 23 ECF No. 29 at 1-2 (individuals named in temporary injunction motion)). This court is unable to 24 issue an order against individuals who are not parties to a suit pending before it. See Zenith 25 Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc., 395 U.S. 100, 112 (1969); Aleknagik Natives Ltd. v. 26 Andrus, 648 F.2d 496, 506 (9th Cir. 1980) (citing Zenith Radio Corp.). 27 //// 28 //// wOAIOe 2 □□ INI OO PI ee AY

1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a District Court Judge be randomly 2 | assigned to this action. 3 IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining 4 | order, docketed July 9, 2020 (ECF No. 29), be DENIED. 5 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 6 | assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within thirty days after 7 | being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 8 | the court. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 9 | Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 10 | may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 11 | Cir. 1991). 12 | Dated: July 14, 2020

14 15 ORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 | pLB:13 DB/ORDERS/ORDERS.PRISONER.CIVIL RIGHTS/colb0725.49a.of&r 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Colbourn v. California Courts, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

(PC) Colbourn v. California Courts ((PC) Colbourn v. California Courts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related