(PC) Castrejon Venegas v. Honea

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CARLOS ANGEL CASTREJON 2:21-cv-2197 AC P VENEGAS, 11 Plaintiff, 12 ORDER AND v. 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS KORY LANE HONEA, et al., 14 Defendants. 15

16 17 By order filed December 19, 2023, plaintiff was granted leave to amend his complaint 18 within thirty days. The thirty day period has long since expired, and plaintiff has not filed an 19 amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 20 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the order was returned, plaintiff 21 was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current 22 address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of 23 the party is fully effective. 24 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a district court judge be randomly assigned to this matter. 25 IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 26 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 27 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 28 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after 1 | being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 2 || the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 3 || Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 4 | waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 5 | 1991). 6 || DATED: December 18, 2024 ~ 7 Ctlhter— Lane g ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28