(PC) Carr v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Opinion

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 CLAUDE CARR, Case No. 1:17-cv-01769-DAD-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST DOCKET TO 13 v. REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL 14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PROCEDURE 41(a)

CORRECTIONS AND 15 (ECF No. 95) REHABILITATION, et al.,

16 Defendants. 17 18 19 On December 20, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing this action with 20 prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF No. 95.) In light of the 21 stipulation of the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), this action is terminated 22 by operation of law, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 23 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs of attorneys’ 24 fees. 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case 2 | and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a). 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. ee 5 | Dated: _ December 21, 2021 ;

‘ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28