(PC) Carr v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

District Court, E.D. California·Decided December 21, 2021·No. 1:17-cv-01769·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLAUDE CARR, Case No. 1:17-cv-01769-DAD-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST DOCKET TO v. REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PROCEDURE 41(a)

CORRECTIONS AND (ECF No. 95) REHABILITATION, et al.,

Defendants. On December 20, 2021, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing this action with prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF No. 95.) In light of the stipulation of the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), this action is terminated by operation of law, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs of attorneys’ fees. / / / / / / / / / / / / Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a). IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. ee Dated: _ December 21, 2021 ;

‘ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Carr v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

(PC) Carr v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ((PC) Carr v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. City of San Jose
111 F.3d 688 (Ninth Circuit, 1997)