(PC) Cardenas v. Coalinga State Hospital

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedJune 9, 2023
Docket1:23-cv-00875
StatusUnknown

This text of (PC) Cardenas v. Coalinga State Hospital ((PC) Cardenas v. Coalinga State Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
(PC) Cardenas v. Coalinga State Hospital, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 | RUBEN LEE CARDENAS, 1:23-cv-00875-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 12 v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 13 | COALINGA STATE HOSPITAL, et al., (ECF No. 2). 14 Defendants. 15 6 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. 17 are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. 18 Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). 19 On June 5, 2023, Plaintiff submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF 20 No. 2). Examination of Plaintiffs application reveals that Plaintiffs unable to afford the costs of 71 this action. Accordingly, Plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is 22 | GRANTED. 23 94 | SO ORDERED. °° | Dated: _ June 9, 2023 [Jee heey — 26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Page v. Torrey
201 F.3d 1136 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
(PC) Cardenas v. Coalinga State Hospital, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pc-cardenas-v-coalinga-state-hospital-caed-2023.