(PC) Cardenas v. Coalinga State Hospital
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RUBEN LEE CARDENAS, 1:23-cv-00875-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS COALINGA STATE HOSPITAL, et al., (ECF No. 2). Defendants. Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). On June 5, 2023, Plaintiff submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2). Examination of Plaintiffs application reveals that Plaintiffs unable to afford the costs of 71 this action. Accordingly, Plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is GRANTED. 94 SO ORDERED. °° | Dated: _ June 9, 2023 [Jee heey — UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PC) Cardenas v. Coalinga State Hospital ((PC) Cardenas v. Coalinga State Hospital) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.