(PC) Calderon v. Covello

• Court: District Court, E.D. California
• Decided: January 4, 2024
• Docket: 2:23-cv-01973
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUAN CARLOS CALDERON, Case No. 2:23-cv-01973-WBS-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 P. COVELLO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On December 1, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 27 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). 28 Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 1 | the record and by the proper analysis. 2 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 3 1. The findings and recommendations filed December 1, 2023, are adopted in full; 4 2. The complaint, ECF No. 1, is dismissed without leave to amend for failure to state a 5 | viable claim under section 1983. 6 3. Plaintiff's remaining motions, ECF Nos. 10, 11, 12, 13, & 14, are denied. 7 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 8 | Dated: January 4, 2024 Js Llec 4p. AZ k 9 WILLIAMB.SHUBB 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28