(PC) Cain v. Paviglianti

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTONIO LAMONT CAIN, No. 2:20-cv-01768-JAM-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 B. PAVIGLIANTI, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking 18 relief under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The matter was referred 19 to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 9, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 9, 2022, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment, ECF No. 35, is denied 4 5 DATED: March 16, 2022 /s/ John A. Mendez 6 THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28