(PC) Cain v. Paviglianti
Opinion
ANTONIO LAMONT CAIN, No. 2:20-cv-01768-JAM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Defendant. Plaintiff, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 9, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. ///// ///// ///// Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed February 9, 2022, are adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment, ECF No. 35, is denied DATED: March 16, 2022 /s/ John A. Mendez THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PC) Cain v. Paviglianti ((PC) Cain v. Paviglianti) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.