(PC) Bullock v. Dowbak

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD LEE BULLOCK, No. 2:23-cv-1634 TLN CKD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 JOHN M. DOWBAK, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 On August 24, 2023, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. The 18 amended complaint was due on April 10, 2024, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. 19 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 20 prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 21 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 22 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 23 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 24 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 25 and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 || time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 2 | Cir. 1991). 3 || Dated: April 22, 2024 Card Kt | / 4 L , ag. — 4 CAROLYNK.DELANEY 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 fi 9 bull 634.fta 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28