(PC) Branch v. Grannis

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedJanuary 18, 2023
Docket1:08-cv-01655
StatusUnknown

This text of (PC) Branch v. Grannis ((PC) Branch v. Grannis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
(PC) Branch v. Grannis, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Opinion

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

10 LOUIS BRANCH, Case No. 1:08-cv-01655-SAB (PC)

11 Plaintiff, TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

12 v. Pretrial Hearing: April 7, 2023, at 9:30 a.m.

13 D. UMPHENOUR, Motions in Limine Hearing: May 10, 2023, at 14 Defendant. 10:00 a.m.

15 Jury Trial: May 23, 2023, at 8:30 a.m. in 16 Courtroom 9 (SAB); 2-3 Days

18 Plaintiff Louis Branch is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. All parties consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF No. 109.) 20 This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s retaliation claim against Defendant Umphenour. 21 The case is ready to be set for jury trial as no dispositive motion was filed. 22 This matter is set for a pretrial conference hearing on April 7, 2023, at 9:30 a.m. The 23 matter is set for a 2 to 3 day jury trial beginning on May 23, 2023, at 8:30 a.m. 24 In preparation of trial, the parties are required to file Pretrial Statements in accordance 25 with the schedule set forth herein. In addition to the matters already required to be addressed in 26 the pretrial statement in accordance with Local Rule 281, Plaintiff will be required to make a 27 1 particularized showing in order to obtain the attendance of witnesses. The procedures and 2 requirements for making such a showing are outlined in detail below. 3 1. Pretrial Statement (Local Rule 281) 4 Pursuant to Local Rule 281, the parties shall file a Pretrial Statement. Plaintiff shall file 5 his Pretrial Statement no later than March 14, 2023. Defendant shall file their Pretrial Statement 6 no later than March 14, 2023. The Pretrial Conference hearing will be held April 7, 2023, at 7 9:30 a.m. before the United States Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone in Courtroom 9. 8 The form and content of the Pretrial Statement must comply with Local Rule 281. 9 Pursuant to Local Rule 281(b), the Pretrial Statement shall including the following matters, 10 under the following captions, and in the following order: 11 (1) Jurisdiction – Venue. The factual and statutory basis of federal jurisdiction and 12 venue and whether there is any dispute concerning jurisdiction or venue; 13 (2) Jury – Non-Jury. Whether the party has demanded a jury trial of all or any of 14 the issues or, if not, whether a demand for jury trial made by any other party is conceded or 15 contested; 16 (3) Undisputed Facts. A plain, concise statement of the facts that are undisputed; 17 (4) Disputed Factual Issues. A plain, concise statement of each fact (and any 18 related essential facts) that the party claims or concedes to be in dispute; 19 (5) Disputed Evidentiary Issues. A plain, concise summary of any reasonably 20 anticipated disputes concerning admissibility of live and deposition testimony, physical and 21 demonstrative evidence and the use of special technology at trial, including computer animation, 22 video discs, and other high technology, and a statement whether each such dispute should be 23 resolved by motion in limine, briefed in the trial, brief, or addressed in some other manner; 24 (6) Special Factual Information in Certain Actions. In addition to the facts and 25 issues described in (3) through (5), the following special information with respect to the 26 following types of actions shall be specified within either the disputed or undisputed facts 27 sections as appropriate: 1 (A) The date, place, and general nature of the incident; the particular acts, 2 omissions, or conditions constituting the basis for liability; the particular acts, omissions or 3 conditions 4 constituting the basis of any defense; any statute, ordinance, or regulation violated by either 5 party; the applicability of the doctrine of strict liability or res ipsa loquitur. 6 (B) Each plaintiff’s age; injuries sustained; any prior injury or condition 7 worsened; periods of hospitalization; medical expenses and estimated future medical expenses; 8 the period of total and/or partial disability; annual, monthly, or weekly earnings before the 9 incident; earnings loss to date and estimated diminution of future earnings power; property 10 damage; general damages; punitive damages; 11 (7) Relief Sought. The elements of monetary damage, if any, and the specific nature 12 of any other relief sought; 13 (8) Points of Law. A statement of the legal theory or theories of recovery or of 14 defense and of any points of law (substantive or procedural) that are or may reasonably be 15 expected to be in controversy, citing the pertinent statues, ordinances, regulations, cases, and 16 other authorities relied upon. Extended legal argument is not required in the pretrial statement; 17 (9) Abandoned Issues. A statement of all issues raised by the pleadings that have 18 been abandoned, including, for example, claims for relief and affirmative defenses; 19 (10) Witnesses. A list (names and addresses) of all prospective witnesses, whether 20 offered in person or by deposition or interrogatory, designating those who are expert witnesses. 21 Only witnesses so listed will be permitted to testify at the trial, except as may be otherwise 22 provided in the pretrial order; 23 (11) Exhibits – Schedules and Summaries. A list of documents or other exhibits that 24 the party expects to offer at trial. Only exhibits so listed will be permitted to be offered at trial 25 except as may be otherwise provided in the pretrial order. 26 (12) Discovery Documents. A list of all portions of depositions, answers to 27 interrogatories, and responses to requests for admission that the party expects to offer at trial; 1 (13) Further Discovery or Motions. Any requests for further discovery or pretrial 2 motions. Whether discovery and/or law and motion has been terminated by a Court order, 3 counsel shall set forth the grounds for relief from that order and why a motion to be relieved was 4 not made before the date ordered in the status conference for termination. Motions for relief at 5 pretrial are not favored and will ordinarily be denied unless the moving party makes a strong 6 showing; 7 (14) Stipulations. Any stipulations requested or offered for pretrial or trial purposes; 8 (15) Amendments – Dismissals. Any requested amendments to pleadings, 9 dismissals, additions or subtractions of parties, or dispositions as to defaulting parties; 10 (16) Settlement Negotiations. A statement whether settlement negotiations between 11 parties and/or a court settlement conference under L.R. 270 would be helpful; 12 (17) Agreed Statements. A statement whether presentation of all or part of the action 13 upon an Agreed Statement of Facts is feasible and advisable; 14 (18) Separate Trial of Issues. A statement whether separate trial of any of the issues 15 is feasible and advisable; 16 (19) Impartial Experts – Limitation of Experts. A statement whether appointment 17 by the Court of impartial expert witnesses or limitation of the number of experts witnesses is 18 advisable; 19 (20) Attorneys’ Fees. A statement whether attorney’s fees are sought and the time 20 and manner in which they are to be ascertained. See L.R. 293; 21 (21) Trial Exhibits. Any special handling of trial exhibits and a statement of 22 advisability of court retention of exhibits pending appeal decision. See L.R. 138(e); 23 (22) Trial Protective Order. Whether a trial protective order will be sought pursuant 24 to L.R. 141.1(b)(2); and 25 (23) Miscellaneous. Any other appropriate comments, suggestions, or information 26 that might aid in the disposition of the action, including references to any matters set forth in 27 Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Luce v. United States
469 U.S. 38 (Supreme Court, 1984)
United States v. Heller
551 F.3d 1108 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
(PC) Branch v. Grannis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pc-branch-v-grannis-caed-2023.